Resident Evil 3 Remake PC Performance Analysis

Keith May
Resident Evil 3

Following in the footsteps of the very successful Resident Evil 2 Remake we see Nemesis and the rest of the crew follow and we dig into the Resident Evil 3 PC Performance from CPU cores, APIs, to graphics cards visual quality and resolution. Packing the same Reach For The Moon engine that powered the RE2 remake we are treated to improvements over that engine in this explosive follow up. If you're in search of a review of the game feel free to see what Nathan had to say about it in his review.

Minimum System Requirements

  • Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
  • OS: WINDOWS® 7, 8.1, 10 (64-BIT Required)
  • Processor: Intel® Core™ i5-4460 or AMD FX™-6300 or better
  • Memory: 8 GB RAM
  • Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 760 or AMD Radeon™ R7 260x with 2GB Video RAM
  • DirectX: Version 11

Testing Methodology

Resident Evil 3 Remake is another one of those fun titles to test, since it doesn't have a built-in utility. Because of this, we had to set up a benchmark course that was repeatable. Thankfully, just like when we looked at Devil May Cry V, I found a good long cutscene that performed in line with the other portions of the game I played through. Interestingly I later learned that it was the same as the opening cutscene usable in the game Demo. The test ran for 2 minutes using the Maximum preset. Much like RE:2 Remake, the game engine claims to call for much more VRAM than it will use while playing so it might be worth changing things around if you find performance a little iffy. Volumetric Lighting seems to be one of the most impactful settings in this one.

Related Story Resident Evil 2, 3, and 7 “Next-Gen” Updates Available Today and Look Nice in a New Trailer

Once we had the results from 3 runs, after discarding an initial burner run for loading purposes, we took the average of average frame rates as well as the 99th percentile results from the run. We report our performance metrics as average frames per second and have moved away from the 1% and .1% reporting and are now using the 99th percentile. For those uncertain of what the 99th percentile is, representing is easily explained as showing only 1 frame out of 100 is slower than this frame rate. Put another way, 99% of the frames will achieve at least this frame rate.

Test System

ComponentsZ370
CPUIntel Core i9-9900k @ 5GHz
Memory 32GB Mushkin Redline DDR4 3600
MotherboardEVGA Z370 Classified K
StorageKingston KC2000 1TB NVMe SSD
PSUCooler Master V1200 Platinum
Windows VersionLatest verion of windows at the time of testing
Hardware-Accelerated GPU SchedulingOn if supported by GPU and driver.

Graphics Cards Tested

GPUArchitectureCore Count
Clock SpeedMemory Capacity
Memory Speed
NVIDIA RTX 2080ti FETuring43521350/163511GB GDDR614Gbps
NVIDIA RTX 2080 SUPER FETuring30721650/18158GB GDDR615.5Gbps
NVIDIA RTX 2070 SUPER FETuring25601605/17708GB GDDR614Gbps
NVIDIA RTX 2060 SUPERTuring21761470/16508GB GDDR614Gbps
NVIDIA RTX 2060 FETuring19041365/1686GB GDDR614Gbps
ZOTAC Gaming GTX 1660Turing14081530/17856GB GDDR58Gbps
ZOTAC GTX 1650 SUPERTuring12801530/17254GB GDDR612Gbps
NVIDIA GTX 1080 FEPascal
25601607/17338GB GDDR5X10Gbps
NVIDIA GTX 1070 FEPascal
19201506/16838GB GDDR58Gbps
NVIDIA GTX 1060 FE 6GBPascal
1280
1506/17086GB GDDR58Gbps
AMD Radeon RX 5700XTNavi 1025601605/1755/19058GB GDDR614Gbps
AMD Radeon RX 5700Navi 1023041465/1625/17258GB GDDR614Gbps
Sapphire RX 5600 XTNavi 1023041130/1660/17506GB GDDR614Gbps
AMD RX Vega 64 Vega 1040961247/15468GB HBM2945Mbps
AMD RX Vega 56Vega 1035841156/14718GB HBM2800Mbs
Sapphire RX 5500 XT 4GBNavi 1414081737/18454GB GDDR614Gbps
MSI RX 580 Armor 8GB Polaris 20230413668GB GDDR58Gbps
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 4GBPolaris 20204813404GB GDDR57Gbps

Drivers Used

Drivers
Radeon Settings 20.4.1
GeForce445.75

Preset Scaling At 4K

Testing presets at 4K gives us a couple of quick metrics before diving into the game too deeply.  First off, it shows us how the game looks at various presets as well as how performance scales with those settings. Using the GeForce RTX 2080Ti you'll have no problems pushing past the 60 FPS target at 4K in this one, but if you move to the Graphics Priority you'll be hard pressed to see the difference other than being able to keep the game locked at over 60 FPS through your gameplay.

UHD 4K Preset Scaling
AVG FPS
99th Percentile
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
Performance Priority
124
108
Balanced
93
82
Graphics Priority
84
72
Max
72
61

Preset Scaling At 1080p

After implementing the 4K Preset Scaling test we found that 1080p scaling with a more appropriate card for that resolution would likely be beneficial as it's the more common resolutions and something like the RX 5500 XT was fairly middle of the road for that class of card. Once again we see that you can run this one without qualms. This was even with the 4GB variant of the RX 5500 XT and big red warning signs about limited VRAM capacity. But in gameplay we never saw it come an issue.

HD 1080p Preset Scaling
AVG FPS
99th Percentile
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
Performance Priority
141
111
Balanced
107
85
Graphics Priority
88
69
Max
76
60

Intel Core Scaling Performance With DX11 vs DX12

While this test won’t tell just how many cores and threads the game can and will use, it does show how the game performs as you move up in cores and threads available. These were tested at the 1080p settings that we tested the rest of the results while pairing the CPU with the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition.  While this does not take into account the cache difference you would see with Intel CPUs as you move through their offering stack it does give us a better idea of how the game benefits and behaves from more cores and threads.

Resident Evil 3 Remake presented us an excellent opportunity to revisit the DX12 implementation for the engine. And just like with the RE2 Remake we found this one to simply run better in DX11 in our testing. That isn't the end of the story however, Mark at OC3D found instances in their testing that DX12 could be a benefit for those on lower performing and lower core count CPUs where it may be the bottleneck, check out his in depth look over here.

Core i9-9900K Core and Thread Scaling
DX11 AVG FPS
DX11 99th Percentile
DX12 AVG FPS
DX12 99th Percentile
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
8c/16t
192
154
179
145
8c/8t
192
154
179
145
6c/12t
192
153
177
145
6c/6t
192
153
177
145
4c/8t
192
153
177
145
4c/4t
191
145
177
145
2c/4t
190
140
177
145
2c/2t
176
141
175
130

Graphics Card Results

1080p

Standard 1080p Performance
AVG FPS
99th Percentile
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
RTX 2080ti FE
192
154
RTX 2080 SUPER
169
135
RTX 2070 SUPER
146
116
RX 5700 XT
138
111
RTX 2060 SUPER
126
99
RX 5700
123
100
RX Vega 64
112
91
RTX 2060 FE
108
84
GTX 1080 FE
105
82
RX Vega 56
105
86
GTX 1070 FE
86
68
GTX 1660
77
59
RX 580 8GB
76
62
RX 5500 XT 4GB
76
60
GTX 1650 SUPER
67
52
RX 570 4GB
71
60
GTX 1060 6GB FE
62
49

Ultrawide 1080p

Ultrawide 1080p Performance
AVG FPS
99th Percentile
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
RTX 2080ti FE
168
137
RTX 2080 SUPER
140
114
RTX 2070 SUPER
121
97
RX 5700 XT
111
94
RTX 2060 SUPER
104
83
RX 5700
100
85
RX Vega 64
90
76
RTX 2060 FE
88
70
GTX 1080 FE
84
68
RX Vega 56
84
71
GTX 1070 FE
65
57
GTX 1660
63
53
RX 5500 XT 4GB
61
53
RX 580 8GB
61
49
RX 570 4GB
57
48
GTX 1650 SUPER
55
43
GTX 1060 6GB FE
49
40

1440p

Standard 1440p Performance
AVG FPS
99th Percentile
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
RTX 2080ti FE
137
113
RTX 2080 SUPER
114
93
RTX 2070 SUPER
97
79
RX 5700 XT
88
75
RTX 2060 SUPER
83
67
RX 5700
78
68
RX Vega 64
72
61
RTX 2060 FE
71
57
GTX 1080 FE
68
55
RX Vega 56
67
58
GTX 1070 FE
55
46
GTX 1660
51
41
RX 5500 XT 4GB
48
41
RX 580 8GB
47
39
RX 570 4GB
44
37
GTX 1650 SUPER
44
35
GTX 1060 6GB FE
39
33

Ultrawide 1440p

Ultrawide 1440p Performance
AVG FPS
99th Percentile
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
RTX 2080ti FE
110
92
RTX 2080 SUPER
91
76
RTX 2070 SUPER
77
64
RX 5700 XT
69
61
RTX 2060 SUPER
66
55
RX 5700
62
55
RX Vega 64
56
49
RTX 2060 FE
56
45
GTX 1080 FE
53
44
RX Vega 56
52
46
GTX 1070 FE
44
37
GTX 1660
41
33
RX 580 8GB
37
29
RX 5500 XT 4GB
36
24
GTX 1650 SUPER
35
28
RX 570 4GB
34
24
GTX 1060 6GB FE
31
26

UHD 4K

UHD 4K Performance
AVG FPS
99th Percentile
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
RTX 2080ti FE
72
61
RTX 2080 SUPER
59
49
RTX 2070 SUPER
50
42
RX 5700 XT
43
38
RTX 2060 SUPER
42
28
RX 5700
38
34
RX Vega 64
35
29
RTX 2060 FE
35
24
GTX 1080 FE
33
24
RX Vega 56
32
28
GTX 1070 FE
27
24
GTX 1660
26
22
RX 580 8GB
23
20
RX 570 4GB
20
16
RX 5500 XT 4GB
20
14
GTX 1650 SUPER
19
12
GTX 1060 6GB FE
19
17

Conclusion

The only thing that is likely to run faster than Nemesis himself is going to be your system if you're running anything half way modern. In most cases you will be seeing cards running their intended gaming resolution breaking the 60 FPS target and if they're a little closer than you'd like to that you can easily eek out more performance by switching to the Graphics Priority settings. This will be one that I am looking to take to the Ryzen 5 3400G over the coming days if I get the time to and see how integrated graphics handle this one.

Resident Evil 3 Remake ups the ante on the graphical side and ramps up the action on the survival horror side, I've played for about 5 hours myself using my Ryzen 9 3900X and RTX 2080 combo on a 3440x1440 Nixeus EDG34 display and have been fully immersed in this one. If there's only one complaint that I have is there are still some audio quality issues here and I can't accurately test the HDR implementation in this one.

Share this story

Comments